That is, Sky and Sister Sarah. In our pet menagerie, we have two birds – finches. If you know your Broadway musicals, you know the names from “Guys and Dolls.”
Sky the bird (on the left in the photo) is much like the character – Brando-esque, full of himself, a con’s con. If he had a cigar, he’d smoke it.
Sarah plays her role well, too. She’s the strong female … less vocal and a bit repressed, but hardly yielding to Sky’s bravado.
My experiment with the birds yesterday was about “change.” Cindy and I talk a lot about change and wanting to make sure we stay as nimble of habit and goals as possible as we age. The odds are against you – routine is comfortable, and I’m convinced that your brain grows less pliant as the years bump along, like an overripe melon that dries up and eventually caves in on itself.
The symptoms are there already: Last night we took the dogs for a walk. I insisted we take a right at the crosswalk like we always do; Cindy’s instinct was to go straight ahead. I nudged her to the right; straight ahead seemed just, uh, wrong. Only later did I ask myself why. In fact, it was opportunity lost: We could have peeked in the window of somebody new.
And so to the birds. They live in a wire cage measuring about 3-foot square and tall.
They do love to talk. We think they mainly talk to each other, but more and more I think they just like to hear their own voices … like those puffed-up, left-right talking heads on Fox or MSNBC who yak more than listen.
We started the birds out in what we call the “TV room,” where we hang out a lot. But their gab was incessant – made worse by TV’s chatter. And invariably their chirps and tweets would shatter a touching moment on the small screen.
So we moved them back to the sunroom, just outside our bedroom. It’s been a nice compromise. They begin their discourse at dawn, but because our door is closed, it’s muted. So we get all the benefits of a rooster without the raw-edged “doodle-do.”
Change does not come easily for these birds. Perhaps it’s because their environment is so small, so anything different within it causes consternation.
Cindy recalls the day when their round, straw house, normally suspended from the cage’s top, broke and tumbled to the bottom. Perched above, Sky and Sarah stared rapidly at each other, then down, then at each other, then down, chattering with each gawk and gape … clearly, their world was now upside down.
So my trick was to deliberately cause such a change but in a more subtle way. And to observe how they’d cope.
Attached to the cage’s front, on either side of the front door, sits a food tray and a water tray. Normally, the food is on the left, the water on the right. It has been that way every day for the last four years. The birds are insatiable, so they visit the food constantly, the water only occasionally. They could land on that food perch with their eyes closed if they had to.
When I change food and water, I pull the trays out while the birds gather on their perch, chattering about what’s coming. Then I pop in the replenished trays and leave. They prefer I not stick around when they size up the new grub.
Per usual, I put in the fresh trays. But this time I switched them … the food now on the right; water now on the left. Then I walked quietly away but just far enough to still watch.
Sarah moved first … she usually does … fluttering immediately to the left tray. Sky hung back, sensing something amiss.
Sarah, seeing water instead of seed, recoiled. Like a child expecting ice cream and getting turnips.
She dashed to the bottom of the cage; Sky joined her. And they looked up, then at each other, then up again.
Only this time, they were speechless.
Their heads would swivel -- right tray, left tray, right, left -- unsure of their next move. You could see it in their silence: Four years of dependability were now gone; their tiny brains were stretching to conceive this new world.
Practically speaking, given the cage’s location, they would now have to fly north to get food, fly south for water.
It was like asking a duck to winter in the Yukon.
I’d never heard such quiet from these two. Clearly, they were out of sorts, struck dumb.
Then Sarah got a grip. She looked right-left again, but this time it seemed less in panic and more in calm deliberation. I think the new reality had dawned. And she was hungry.
Up she went, to the north. She landed. Usually she would snatch seeds immediately. But if a bird can sniff, she did it then. It seemed okay to her: The brightly colored seeds rested in front like usual, the tray’s perch felt the same. Sure, the context was out of kilter; the views through the cage seemed different … like moving the dinner table to the rumpus room.
But she was hungry.
So she ate.
Useless, Sky remained below, skeptical, maybe waiting to see if Sarah would keel over.
Finally, his thick head catching up to his stomach, he flew next to her, shoving her a bit to the side. She ignored him, continuing to eat.
This morning when I awoke, all was normal. The birds, snapped awake by the sun, had been chitchatting for a couple of hours … yesterday’s turbulence seemed hardly a memory.
My guess, though, is that Sarah’s brain waves are a little less taut than before. And that if I flopped the trays again, she’d adjust more quickly this time. Sky probably would dither, although I hope for not as long. And eventually, if I did it every day, there’d be no hesitation at all.
And that’s the lesson. A simple one that should be obvious but it seems less so with time: What seems inconceivable or impossible -- a change in situation, a goal, a wish -- shouldn’t be fought or ignored. Instead, accept it, or better yet, go find it. Then wrap your arms around it and squeeze like your life depends on it.
I kind of think it does.
Sarah knows.



